1. The defendant's case against the plaintiff of the Daejeon District Court of the Daejeon District Court of the Taean District Court of the Taean District Court of the 2018 tea and 209 goods price case.

The Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff would pay the price of goods by November 30, 2013, and applied for a payment order claiming KRW 7,867,240 of the price of goods and delay damages from the Seo-gun District Court 2018 (Seoul District Court 2018Hu209), Seo-gun District Court 209. Since the above application for the payment order was filed on June 3, 2018, which was three years after the date when the Defendant asserted the payment period, the Defendant had already expired the statute of limitations prior to the application for the payment order.

Therefore, compulsory execution based on the above payment order should not be permitted.