1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. As to motor vehicles listed in paragraph 1 of the attached list of motor vehicles, the Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Office.

1. According to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the mortgagee, mortgage holder, and limited liability company with respect to automobiles listed in the annexed automobile list (hereinafter “each of the instant automobiles”) shall be the defendant, mortgage holder, and limited liability company with respect to the automobiles listed in the annexed automobile list No. 1, the separate collateral mortgage with the claim value of KRW 2.8 million on November 20, 2014; the separate collateral mortgage with the claim value of KRW 2.4 million on November 20, 2014 with respect to the automobiles listed in the annexed automobile list No. 2. 3 of the annexed automobile list No. 3, the separate collateral mortgage with the claim value of KRW 1.28,80,000 on November 20, 2014 with the claim value of KRW 2.5 million on December 1, 2014 with the claim value of KRW 2.5 million on each of the instant automobiles as the owner of each of the instant automobiles.

2. The defendant's assertion and its determination as to the defendant's assertion, the limited liability company, which is the debtor, set up each of the instant mortgages four times by lending KRW 43.4 million to the debtor and establishing each of the instant mortgages, and the limited liability company, which caused property damage in the amount of KRW 43.4 million due to the non-payment of the debt. The plaintiff asserts to the purport that it is improper for the plaintiff to pay the total amount of the claim value of each of the instant mortgages and seek cancellation of each of the instant mortgages. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiff had assumed the debt against the defendant with limited liability company, and it is secured by