logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.10.12 2017고단2266
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for six months, for Defendant B, for ten months, for Defendant C, and for Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant C was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud on October 29, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 30, 2016.

[2] Under the criminal facts, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport with regard to the structure of the crime of fraud of lending money to false workers, and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport with regard to public offering, operate a system of lending money to workers who borrow money from the National Housing Fund at a rate lower than the market interest rate without securing the entire housing loan to stabilize housing of homeless workers.

그러나 근로자 주택 전세자금 대출 관련 업무를 위탁 받은 금융기관이 형식적인 심사만 하고 대출을 해 준다는 사실을 알고, 대출 브로커들은 허위로 임차인과 임대인 역할을 하는 사람들과 함께 근로자 주택 전세자금 대출금을 가로챌 것을 모의하였다.

Accordingly, loan broscers held false employment-related documents and false details related to the lessee as a person holding the name of the lending, and held false documents to the lessee who will perform the lease. The false lessee, as above, submitted documents related to the falsely prepared employment and the written contract for the lease of the house to the financial institution, and applied for the lease of the house to the employee while applying for the loan of the lease of the house to the financial institution. If the request for confirmation of the actual existence of the lease of the house enters into the financial institution, the lessor, who is obligated to perform the lease of the house, applied for the lease of the house of the employee and received the loan of the house of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the house

Specific criminal facts

1. Defendant F, Defendant G, Defendant C, and Defendant D’s joint crimes are false lessees, Defendant G are false lessors, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant D’s name in a false manner, each of which is the bropsyer for the loan of the entire lease fund, and is divided by the following.

arrow