1. Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

2. The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B, from March 30, 200 to March 11, 2012, from March 30, 2012 to March 11:00, 2012, the first three points of the three points of the three points, using 51 scams from the house of Gyeong-si G, Gyeong-si, and F in the second floor, shall be added to three points, 1,000 won, 5 points, 2,000 won, 3,000 won, and 3,00 won shall be paid to the tension, and all of seven scams received as the scams shall be considered as the scams, belt, scams, or the 3 scams, as the scams, "scams" in a manner that receives KRW 10,00 from the other party.

In addition, the aforementioned method from June 16, 2012 to June 06:00, as indicated in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet, Defendant A, as shown in the following: (a) gambling, i.e., a “stop” of habitual 12 times in total; and (b) Defendant B, i.e., a “stop” of habitual 10 times in total; (c) gambling, i.e., a “stop” of habitual 10 times in total; and (d) Defendant C, i.e., a “stop” of habitual 9 times in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A copy of each protocol of suspect examination of H and I by the prosecution;

1. A copy of each police interrogation protocol of J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R, S, T, U,V, and W;

1. The offender's place, photograph, criminal place, investigation report (as to a copy of the book of H), investigation report (as to an application for the provision of communication data and results of H's mobile phone analysis and request for the provision of communication data), inquiry report, investigation report (as to each suspect's cell phone analysis data of H's cell phone), cremation photographic data, and investigation report (as to a reply to video data), and investigation report;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure (the investigative records, No. 44, 45 pages);

1. Each habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the frequency of each crime in the judgment and the fact that the same kind of crime has been committed systematically several times;

1. The Defendants: Article 246(2) and Article 246(2) of the Criminal Act.