A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Gu-U.S. private park development project is a park development project implemented on the basis of Article 21-2 of the Urban Park and Green Areas Act and the guidelines for special cases on development activities (Ordinance No. 764 of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport No. 764) in a site for urban parks. The company selected as the project implementer shall create a park in an area of at least 70% of a site of at least 68,860 square meters per Gu-U.S.D., which shall be donated to the Gu-U.S. and shall be donated to the Gu-U.S. Si, but

On September 26, 2016, M&A Co., Ltd. submitted a proposal as the first proposer of the private park development project in the Gu-U.S. Park Green belt division. Accordingly, on October 7, 2016, the Gu-U.S. Park Green belt division publicly announced the third party proposal of the above project.

The defendant is a person who actually operates E, a civil engineering design company, and the victim F is a person who operates a G architect office.

1. On October 26, 2016, the Defendant, who committed the crime of October 26, 2016, recommended the victim to participate in the above project by stating that “The degree of an apartment 4,00 households is a new project, and there is a lot of profits in the surrounding area, so it is difficult to find out whether there is a person who is able to operate the project,” and the victim was willing to participate in the project by having the business operator participate in the project.

Afterward, the defendant shall pay the expenses to the public official in charge of viewing the Gu and the Gu to the victim in order to comply with the project.

The extent of the green belt and the division of the park should not be considered.

There is a difference in the money needed for this, and around October 26, 2016, the amount of KRW 10 million was deposited from the injured party to the Agricultural Cooperative (I) account in the name of the Defendant’s wife, for solicitation expenses to the public officials of the Gu and the Gu.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he shall use it as living expenses.