logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.09.09 2015나8886
입회보증금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

(b) are subject to the protection of the Sports Facilities Act only for recruited members after submitting a membership recruitment plan to the head of the Gu pursuant to Article 18(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the said Act;

In addition, there is no evidence to prove the fact that MJS or E submitted a membership recruitment plan to the head of Sungnam-si branch office, so it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff is subject to protection of the Sports Facilities Act.

B. Whether the Defendants succeeded to the sports facility business or not is awarded a successful bid for the instant real estate as seen earlier.

However, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including paper numbers) above, members management DB servers, members management WEB servers, Ortoty business S/W, UPSless driving range (4 forms), UPSless electric power source equipment: (including DC conversion equipment), Oralty business (1*15), Doz. Doz. 15, Doz. 201, Doz. Doz. 202, 2012, 202, 206, 2012, 2862, 2012, 301, 301, 204, 301, 204, 305, 201, 305, 201, 302, 325, 301, 300, 201, 325, 201, 31, 325, 301, etc.

arrow