logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.09.02 2016노685
재물손괴등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) is that the Defendant: (a) destroyed a vehicle owned by the victim as stated in the facts charged; or (b) did not assault the victim, the lower court convicted all of the facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting

2. The defendant asserts the same purport in the court below, and the court below rejected the above argument by stating in detail the judgment on "a summary of evidence" at the bottom. In light of the records, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no error of law of misunderstanding of facts as alleged by the defendant. Thus, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow