Text
1. The Defendants: Daejeon District Court, Daejeon District Court, August 28, 1996, as to the real estate stated in the attached list to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On February 13, 1996, the Plaintiff purchased real estate listed in the separate sheet from Defendant B and G, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 16, 1996.
B. In order to secure the balance of the purchase and sale obligation against Defendant B and G, the Plaintiff completed the registration of creation of a mortgage over the maximum debt amount of KRW 7.5 million on August 28, 1996 with respect to the said real estate on August 22, 1996.
C. On July 4, 2012, G succeeded to G’s property by Defendant C, E, and F, a spouse, Defendant D, E, and F.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the prescription period of the secured debt of the right to collateral security completed in the future between Defendant B and G has expired since August 22, 1996, and as of the date of the closing of the argument of this case, the above claim has expired due to the completion of prescription, and it is reasonable to view that the registration of the establishment of the right to collateral security in the name of Defendant B and G, which secured the above claim, has also become null and void.
Therefore, the defendants are obligated to implement the procedure for cancellation registration of the registration of the establishment of the above neighboring mortgage to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.