(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.20 2014가합33593

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.20 2014가합33593

사용료

Text

1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 200,328,914 and KRW 108,842,510 among them, from March 13, 2014 to 66.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff, a specialized credit financial company operating installment financing business, facility leasing business, etc., entered into a lease agreement with the Defendants on March 29, 2012 with respect to the lease term of 44 months, monthly rent of 3,175,148 won, annual interest rate of delay rate of 25%, and the lease agreement with respect to the BMW 320D vehicles (vehicle No. D) modeled on May 2, 2012, each of the above contracts was entered into between the Defendants (hereinafter referred to as “each of the above contracts” and “each of the above contracts” by adding each of the above contracts to “each of the above contracts” and “each of the above contracts.

(2) According to each of the instant lease agreements, when the Defendants, a lessee, violated the duty to pay rent, insurance premium, etc. on one occasion, and (2) when using a vehicle to a third party without the Plaintiff’s prior written consent, and (3) when selling, transferring, sub-lease, or offering a security to a third party, the Plaintiff may immediately terminate the said lease agreement and seek payment of related obligations by losing the benefit of time if the Defendants did not perform their obligations within a reasonable period not exceeding 30 days after giving notice to the Defendants to perform their obligations within the said period.

2) At the time of entering into each of the instant lease agreements, a certificate of acceptance of a motor vehicle stating the purport to verify the acquisition of each of the instant leased vehicles according to the pertinent lease agreement (hereinafter “certificate of acceptance of the instant motor vehicle”).

2) Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”).

The name and seal of the Defendant B, and the Defendant B signed and delivered the signature to the Plaintiff.

Specific contents are as follows, and in the certificate of acceptance of this case, the name and seal or signature of the lessee shall be under the direct supervision of the contents.

In accordance with the automobile lease contract with Egyptian.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원의성지원 2015.08.26 2014가단1968

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.29 2017가합1979

-창원지방법원 2019.08.22 2018나64105

-창원지방법원 2019.08.22 2016나58533

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.17 2015가합27748