logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2012.12.07 2012고정231
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Although anyone is prohibited from selling, lending, or distributing drugs harmful to juveniles, etc. to juveniles, the defendant operated a knick-gun'D'C'D' in the trade name of "Sacheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, and the defendant sold 12 disease, beer, 2 disease, 1,700 C, and 12 disease, 1,700 C, a juvenile harmful to juveniles, without verifying the age of 11, such as juveniles E (18 years old and age), from February 27, 2012 to February 30, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness E, F, G, H, I, J, and K;

1. Each statement of L, M and N;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on business reporting, each investigation report, on-site photographs, invoices, persons, and business notification cards;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 51 subparagraph 8 of the Juvenile Protection Act and Article 26 (1) of the same Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion regarding the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion that the defendant confirmed one of three juveniles' daily behaviors which had been first at the time of the instant case, and the remaining two persons were born in 93 years, and upon the request for a presentation of identification card, they did not cause any false identification card, and they sold alcoholic beverages to the defendant. However, according to each of the above evidence, the defendant's assertion that the defendant sold alcoholic beverages to the defendant without requiring the defendant's presentation of identification card at all on the same day. Thus, the above assertion is rejected.

arrow