1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The key issue of this Court is that the plaintiff in the first instance court filed a claim for the principal suit seeking the cost of work and the cost of temporary materials, and the defendant filed a claim for a counterclaim seeking the cost of restoration work.

Part of the claim for the cost of construction in the main claim is partly accepted, and the part of the claim for the cost of construction in the temporary materials was dismissed, and each part of the claim for the cost of oil, employee's benefits, and material cost was partly cited, and the part of the claim for the cost of restoration was dismissed.

In this regard, the plaintiff appealed to the first instance judgment on the part of the claim for temporary damages and the part of the claim for the employee's benefits and the part of the claim for material costs among the counterclaim, and determined the scope of dissatisfaction as stated in the purport of appeal.

2. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the court’s explanation is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance except for a partial modification as follows. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 5-17 of the 5th 15th 17th 17th "Dak Development claims that the Plaintiff pay KRW 50 million to the temporary material losses during the construction period, which has been increased due to the collapse accident of this case." "The construction period has been extended due to the collapse accident of this case. The Plaintiff has already paid KRW 5 million out of the temporary material losses for the consideration and development caused by this 45 million, and the remaining KRW 40 million has already been settled between the Plaintiff and the Korea Development, which the Plaintiff shall pay later between the Plaintiff and the Korea Development, and the 52.5 million of the cost of dismantling the provisional facility was directly borne by the Plaintiff." The 10th 19th 10th 10th 19th 10th : 4th 2.5000,000,0000,000,0000: 4th : non-recognition of the construction material losses: the design collapse drawings prepared by the Defendant, and the construction work and the period has increased.