1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to Defendant B Company 15,789,747,120 won and its KRW 941,691,203 among them, Defendant B Company 13 November 13, 2013.

1. The facts constituting the grounds for the attachment of the facts of recognition are deemed to have been led to the confession of the above defendant between the plaintiff and the defendant F, and it can be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the pleadings among the plaintiff and the remaining defendants.

On the other hand, the joint and several sureties died on September 7, 2013, and the fact that Defendant E, Defendant G, and H, the wife of the property heir at the time, had no dispute between the parties.

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, since the net I's guarantee obligation is inherited at the rate of 2:2:0,00 won and delay damages, the defendant Eul corporation paid 15,789,747,120 won and delay damages, and the defendant Eul corporation paid 15,779,247,120 won and delay damages, and the defendant Eul paid 7,36,05,917 won and delay damages, and the defendant Eul paid 374,169,428 won and delay damages, and the defendant Eul paid 374,69,428 won and delay damages. The defendant Eul paid 12,60,000 won and delay damages, and the defendant Eul paid 12,60,000 won and delay damages, respectively, the defendant Eul corporation and the defendant Eul shall be liable to pay 249,46,286,287,200 won and delay damages.

B. As to this, Defendant E, G, and H received the decision of qualified acceptance adjudication, the Plaintiff’s claim should be accepted within the scope of inherited property.

On November 26, 2013, Defendant E, G, and H filed a petition for an adjudication on limited acceptance of inheritance with the Suwon District Court 2013 Madan5055, the said court rendered a judgment on January 28, 2014 that the said Defendants’ qualified acceptance of the said Defendants’ qualified acceptance report was accepted, and the said judgment became final and conclusive at that time is significant in this court. Thus, the said Defendants’ above assertion is with merit.

C. Therefore, for the Plaintiff, ① Defendant B Co., Ltd., as to KRW 15,789,747,120 and KRW 941,691,203 among them, KRW 7,451,520,00 from November 13, 2013, KRW 7,451,520 from July 30, 2014, KRW 7,355,555,917 from December 19, 2014, KRW 10,50,000.