1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 8, 2010, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Pakistan (C-3) with a short-term visit (C-3) as a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Pakic Republic”), and applied for refugee status recognition to the Defendant on September 7, 2012. B. The Defendant on March 18, 2014, and the Plaintiff on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”).

Article 1 and the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter referred to as “Refugee”)

(2) On the ground that a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) cannot be deemed as having “a well-founded fear of persecution” as prescribed in Article 1.

(C) On May 19, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the said objection on April 2, 2015, and, in consideration of humanitarian aspects, decided the Plaintiff as a “human resident” pursuant to Article 2 subparag. 3 of the Refugee Act. [In accordance with the grounds for recognition, evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, 2, and 1, and 2, the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The instant disposition should be revoked on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s assertion is unlawful.

(1) The Defendant: (a) made an interview in accordance with the refugee interview procedure only to the Plaintiff’s father B (hereinafter “B”); and (b) made the instant disposition against the Plaintiff without undergoing an interview under the former Immigration Control Act; and (c) as such, the instant disposition is erroneous in the course of the procedure, and thus, should be revoked.

(2) The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s families, who were de facto illegal causes, were threatened with the families of their home countries and the Pakistan shotos located in the Republic of Korea on the grounds that they were married to the Republic of Korea during their stay in Korea.

If the plaintiff returned to his own country, the disposition of this case which did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee despite the possibility of persecution for religious reasons.