The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment appears to have recognized the crime of this case and against it, there is no particular criminal history other than the fine, and some of the embezzlements appears to have used to pay the proceeds to have been sold at a discount due to pressure on performance, and the defendant suffers severe depression due to business failure and has family members to provide support, etc. However, even though the period of the defendant's service in the damaged company is not more than six months, the amount of the embezzlement of this case is less than 5,9650,000,000, and it is not agreed with the victim, and it is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, character, environment, circumstance and result of the crime of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in this case, such as the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 346 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.