1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 15, 1974, the Plaintiff’s husband’s husband (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s husband”) entered Jinindo Co., Ltd., and worked for about 19 years until the closure of the business in around 1993, and was exposed to Eulcarbon, which is a hazardous substance. Around July 12, 1995, the Defendant continued to receive hospitalization and medical care by July 4, 201 after obtaining the Defendant’s approval for eulic patitionism, patisissis, and other network change.

B. On August 22, 2011, at around 11:36, the Deceased was hospitalized in the emergency room of the 119 rescue team, and then died at around 22:24 on the same day.

The doctor of the deceased presumed the direct death of the deceased as the heart color and the pre-exploitic heart disease.

C. On September 20, 201, the Plaintiff asserted that the deceased died during the treatment process of an approved injury and applied for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant. However, on December 7, 201 of the same year, the Defendant rejected against the Plaintiff on December 7, 201, that the proximate causal relation between the deceased’s death and the injury-disease recognized as the industrial accident caused by the in-depth color cannot be recognized

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [The grounds for recognition] Gap’s 1, 2, and Eul’s 1, 3, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff caused a wide range of sulphism addiction to cause urine diseases or promote the progress thereof, and although the deceased suffered from urine diseases, which are the risk of urine diseases, there is a research result that urine poisoning poisoning causes urine changes and urine urology, it can be deemed that the deceased's acute urine urine eculation was caused by urculism or rapidly aggravated urculous urcule at a natural speed. Thus, the proximate causal link between the deceased's death and occupational accidents should be recognized.