The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that there is no fact that the defendant is led to two times the main points indicated in the facts charged, or when he/she faces a victim by drinking, because he/she goes beyond the victim, or is less than the back of the victim;

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below is consistent with the evidence duly adopted and examined, i.e., the victim E, from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, stated to the effect that "the victim E was used on the floor by cutting down the door from the defendant, was pushed off and pushed off the defendant, and was taken off the left face again," and the above statement can be trusted in light of the body and consistency, etc. of the victim, and ii) consistently stated that "the defendant was not deemed to have caused the victim less than the back of the victim's title and more than 2 pages," and the court of the court of the court below stated that "the victim was unable to be deemed to have caused the victim's injury," but the investigative agency opened the victim's door at two times, and opened the police station and stated the victim's cell phone immediately after the victim got out of the police station and reported the victim's identity to the police station of this case (the victim was called out of the police station of this case."

Therefore, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

Furthermore, the contents of the judgment below and the judgment of the court below are legitimate.