1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. With respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”), the Defendant is each insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to B vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On October 4, 2017, around 15:00, the Plaintiff’s vehicle left the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was sent to the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the Defendant’s vehicle, which was sent to the right side of the 4 lane from the 111st place to the 4th place in the 10th place in the 10th place in the 10th place in the 10th place in the 10th place in the 10th place in the 10th place in the 20th place in the 20th place in the 20th place in the 20th place.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On November 16, 2017, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,578,000 as insurance money for the repair cost of Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries or videos of Gap's evidence 1 to 7, the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The instant accident occurred due to the negligence on the part of the Defendant vehicle, taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Plaintiff’s vehicle has the right to take priority in driving with a straight-line vehicle; (b) the Defendant’s vehicle, which is a non-protective left-hand left-hand vehicle, has the right to take priority in driving with a straight-hand vehicle; and (c) the Defendant’s vehicle, which is a non-protective left-hand vehicle, should not interfere with the driving of the Plaintiff’s vehicle; and (d) even if the Plaintiff’s vehicle was aware of passing through the intersection, it did not turn the direction direction, and left-hand turn at the center. Accordingly, the Defendant’s vehicle is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the 1,578,000 won and the delay damages therefor. (ii) The Defendant’s vehicle confirmed and protected the vehicle without a straight-hand vehicle at the time when the left-hand turn of the Defendant vehicle was completed, so long as the accident of this case occurred by entering the intersection at a considerable speed.

B. The evidence mentioned above is the whole of the arguments.