Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and suspension of qualifications for one year.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a doctor who operates an Isanbu in Daejeon U.S. M. H.

At around 11:00 on December 30, 2013, the Defendant was commissioned by the J, a pregnant woman, to perform a abortion surgery at the above IO’s father and the pregnant woman, and the Defendant added the said J’s womb into the operation room, added a approximately 5th fetus into the body and added it to the body, and added it to the fetus by taking a method of spraying approximately 5 weeks of a fetus out of the body and discharging it out of the body. From that time to December 3, 2014, the Defendant received a commission from the pregnant woman on a total of 32 occasions as shown in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet.

2. Defendant B and C are assistant nurses who work in the Isanbu referred to in the above paragraph (1).

As stated in the above paragraph (1), when a doctor A, who is a pregnant woman, has been commissioned by the pregnant woman J, etc. over 32 times in total, the Defendants aided and abetted a pregnant woman to commit a crime by injecting the anesthesia from an operation room to a pregnant woman through a beer inception equipment, making it easy to commit the crime by inception and so on, in such a way as to kill the pregnant woman’s eye and pulmon, or prepare an antibiotics and chlorates to a pregnant woman outside of

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against J,K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R, T, U, V, X,Y, Z, AAB, AC, AE, AE, AF, AH, AH, AI, and AJ;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police seizure records and seizure lists;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 270(1) and (4) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of abortion in the line of duty and the concurrent imposition of qualification) for the defendant A: Article 270(1) and Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act for the crime;

1. Legal mitigation (deed relief mitigation) Defendant BC: Articles 32 (2) and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (Concurrent punishment of qualification suspension determined by Article 38 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for Defendant A);

1. The Defendant BC to be suspended: each.