A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 14, 2017, the injured Defendant: (a) was on the street above 103 Dong-ro apartment units 103, Dong-ro apartment units 106, Jinju City, Ga-si; (b) was boarding with the victim B (37 years old); (c) went to the destination after having arrived at the destination; and (d) again was under the influence of alcohol, without any justifiable reason, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol; (c)

our form is anywhere;

Chewing strings and alleys expressed the victim's face at several times and breaths, which require treatment for 14 days between 14 days to the victim, while drinking, she skeed the victim's face.

2. On the same day, at around 02:45 on the same day as Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant damaged the equipment for public use by a police officer belonging to the Jinju Police Station, who was called upon the above report as referred to in the above B, to have the Defendant embark on the back seat of the 112 patrol vehicle after arresting the Defendant as an offender, and to have the Defendant embarked on the back seat of the 112 patrol vehicle, which is a building for public use, at several times, and thereby, damaged the Defendant to have a total of KRW 68,00 in repair costs.

3. Around 04:30 on the same day as paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, in the Jinju Police Station type and the office room of the watchkeeping Team at Jinju-si, Jinju-si, Jinju-si, 24:30, the Defendant used the Defendant to take over the Defendant to the above office of the watchkeeping Team; (b) expressed that, “F, young police officers, shot, spiting, spit, etc., of E’s face to walk and walk the f’s face; and (c) spit, spit, etc. on the face of Jinju-si, Jinju-si, Police Officers affiliated with Jinju-si, Police Officers, and Police Officers.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to B, E, and F;

1. Photographss of police vehicles, or spits of the defendant, spits;

1. Ethical photo;

1. Photographss by capturing a black stuffe image;

1. Photographs impeding the performance of public duties;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;