1. All of the lawsuits for retrial of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the defendant.

1. The following facts, which have become final and conclusive in the judgment subject to review, are apparent in records or obvious to this court.

On November 18, 2002, around 01:17, when the development of the Simpo-si Simpo-si, G and H died on their job due to the above accident. The first line, in front of the bankruptcy village where the insolvency village was located, where the Defendants’ G was driving on the roads of the first line by Defendant D and the first one driven by the Plaintiffs, where the Defendants’ G were driving on the roads of the first line.

B. On February 1, 2005, the court of first instance rendered a decision to dismiss all of the plaintiffs' claims against the above C Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co., Ltd. under the fact-finding that he caused net G Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd., which

C. Only the Defendants were dissatisfied with the above judgment of the court of first instance and filed an appeal with Busan High Court 2005Na5164 (Mains) and 5171 (Counterclaim). On April 27, 2006, the Busan High Court partially accepted the Plaintiffs’ claim against the Defendants, dismissed the remainder of the claim, and the judgment of the court of first instance was modified with the content of accepting the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants against the Defendants, and dismissed the appeal against the Defendants’ counterclaim (hereinafter “the judgment of retrial”).

The Defendants filed an appeal against only the Plaintiffs on the judgment subject to a retrial with the Supreme Court Decision 2006Da30471, 3048 (Counterclaim). The Supreme Court dismissed all the Defendants’ appeals on July 14, 2006.

Accordingly, among the parts related to the principal lawsuit of the judgment subject to a retrial for which the Defendants sought a retrial, the part against the Defendants became final and conclusive as is.

E. The Defendants are only the Plaintiffs.