The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Two for a disposable divers seized 1, 1.

The Defendant asserts that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as the grounds for appeal of this case are too unreasonable.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case and the fact that the defendant reflects the errors and actively cooperates in the investigation, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, since the appeal by the defendant is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the following is ruled again

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and the facts charged by the defendant and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are the same as the corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 60 (1) 2 and Article 4 (1) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. and the Selection of Penalty for Crimes and Imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 67 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, etc. subject to Confiscation and Collection;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;