logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014.6.12.선고 2011다33429 판결
아파트동,호수추첨
Cases

2011Da33429 Apartment Dong, lake lottery

Plaintiff, Appellant

As shown in the separate list of Plaintiffs.

Defendant, Appellee

A Apartment1 Complex Reconstruction Association

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2010485807 Decided March 31, 2011

Imposition of Judgment

June 12, 2014

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

1. The fact that the performance of an obligation is impossible is not simply an absolute and physical impossibility, but a creditor cannot expect the realization of the obligor’s performance in light of the experience rules or transaction norms in the social life (see Supreme Court Decision 2000Da22850, Jan. 24, 2003, etc.).

2. According to the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below acknowledged that the above new apartment units were newly built 40 units of 275 units of 20 units of 10 units of 4 units of 20 units of 1 units of 4 units of 4 units of 20 units of 20 units of 1 units of 4 units of 20 units of 1 units of 4 units of 4 units of 20 units of 2 units of 5 units of 1 units of 1 units of 4 units of 4 units of 5 units of 2 units of 1 units of 1 units of 4 units of 7 units of 5 units of 2 units of 7 units of 5 units of 1 units of 20 units of 5 units of 1 units of 1 units of 1 units of 2 units of 1 units of 1 units of 2 units of 5 units of 1 units of 1 units of 1 units of 1 units of 3 units of 1 units of 7 units of 1 units of 2 units of 1 units of 3 units of 4 units of 1 units of 1 units of 1 units of 2.

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above judgment of the court below is just and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles as to non-performance as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Lee Sang-hoon

Justices Shin Young-young

Justices Kim Yong-deok

Justices Kim So-young

Site of separate sheet

A person shall be appointed.

arrow