(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.06.11 2014고정838

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.06.11 2014고정838

퇴거불응

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 5, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with labor at the Seoul Western District Court for the crime of interference with business, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 5, 2015.

around 05:20 on November 28, 2013, the Defendant received a demand from the victim D to ‘E' operated by the victim D in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu and the second floor to change business hours. However, without any reason, the Defendant did not comply with the demand from the victim to 05:20 on the end of business hours and stayed for about 80 minutes, and so, the Defendant left the victim's legitimate evictions.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A statement recorded outside the trial date of a witness D ( November 18, 2014);

1. Previouss before ruling: Criminal history records, correspondence records, and case detailed statements, which are judged as to the defense counsel's assertion;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel in the summary of the argument shall leave the defendant from 04:00 to 05:00 on the day of the instant case.

There was no awareness and intent that the Gu does not accept the return of the consideration, and thereafter, the police officer tried to discuss the issue of return of the consideration for the consideration for the consideration for the consideration of the consideration for the consideration for the consideration of the consideration for

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, i.e., the Defendant, along with the Defendant, went to the victim at around 03:40, while drinking alcohol within the main place operated by the victim.

The term "out of the main point" refers to the fact that the defendant moved out of the main point, ② the defendant returned to the main point of 04:00 when the main place of business is closed, and ② the defendant again demanded the victim to return to the main place of 04:00 when the main place of business is closed, ③ The victim said that the main place of business has been terminated, but the defendant did not respond to it, ④ the police officer who received the victim's report was dispatched to the site at around 04:50 and requested the defendant to leave, but the defendant continued to comply with it.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2014.02.12 2013고정3278

-창원지방법원 2020.08.27 2020고단1839

-의정부지방법원 2015.08.18 2015고단731

-서울서부지방법원 2017.12.21 2017고정1169

-의정부지방법원 2014.12.29 2014고단844