logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.07.24 2018가단539464
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Defendant A is the first building listed in the annexed real estate list;

B. Defendant B shall list the attached real estate.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendants as shown in the separate lease agreement list.

B. Defendant E urged the submission and renewal of documents necessary for the renewal of the contract upon the termination of the lease contract, but failed to comply therewith. The remaining Defendants urged the payment and renewal of the increased amount of deposit as stated in the above list, but failed to perform the above obligation.

[Reasons for Recognition] 0 Defendant A, B: Confession, Defendant C: The fact that no dispute is raised, the entries in Gap evidence 1-4 and evidence 2-4, the purport of the whole pleadings, 0D, and E: Service by publication.

2. 청구원인에 관한 판단 위 인정사실에 의하면, 원고와 피고들 사이에 각 이�차계약은 임대차계약 기간이 만료되거나 증액보증금 미납을 이유로 해지되었으므로, 피고들은 원고에게 청구취지 기재와 같이 건물을 명도할 의무를 부담한다.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified.

arrow