beta
Text
Defendant
V Imprisonment for three years, and Defendant W shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
V, while engaging in the activities of "Z", recruited loan applicants and delivered documents, such as passbooks, OTP, physical card, credit card, cell phone, identification card, and other documents necessary for loan fraud, and then delivered them to A, a certain amount of money is paid as service charges. A forged relevant documents, such as the certificate of employment and the statement of payment, as if loan applicants are in service, and then conspired to receive the maximum amount of loans by applying for loan at the same time to many financial institutions (loan companies).
1. The Defendants and A’s joint criminal offenders introduced W wishing to borrow a loan through the branch, and Defendant W sent documents, such as Defendant W’s passbook, credit card, official certificate, and identification card copy, to Kwikset Service, around October 2016, according to Defendant V’s order, and A prepared false documents, such as the details of payment, health insurance qualification confirmation, health long-term health care premium payment confirmation, etc., as if the documents were in service in W A by using the above documents.
A. On April 20, 2017, the Defendants filed a loan transaction agreement with A and A in the office of Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and Defendant W prepared a loan transaction agreement with loans of KRW 10 million, and sent it by facsimile to the victim company. Defendant V submitted documents, such as the details of the above benefits and the written confirmation of the acquisition of health insurance qualification requirements to the effect that W is in a position with A, and Defendant C submitted documents to the effect that W is in a position with A, and Defendant B confirmed the fact in the victim company’s loan confirmation phone.
However, the facts are that A created the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and the defendant W prepared a false document as if he was in office in the above company, and the defendant W did not have the intent or ability to repay even if he received a loan from the victim company.
Nevertheless, the Defendants are against A.