1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 27, 2013, the Plaintiff, an alien of the nationality of the Republic of Egypt (hereinafter “Egypt”) and staying in the Republic of Korea on the grounds of tourism and Tong (B-2) sojourn status on November 27, 2013, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on December 23, 2013, prior to the expiration of the period of sojourn ( December 27, 2013).

B. On December 29, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that would be subject to persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 2, and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion slot-type group has been under the influence of the Egypt regime, such as discharging B from the presidential line on June 30, 2012 to the President. However, on July 3, 2013, the Egypt’s regime began to be serious until now since the suppression and gambling of the Egypt’s illegal sclater’s non-sclateral sclateral sclater’s non-sclateral sclateral sclateral sclaters, such as the withdrawal of B from the presidential line to the President.

The father of the plaintiff has been engaged in trade business and glass processing business in Egypt, and has been arrested on October 10, 2013 on the ground that Egypt was an unslatered group, and has been detained in Egypt security department so far.

The Plaintiff’s death who was residing in Saudi Arabia, heard his father’s awareness of arrest on October 15, 2013, and returned from home on October 15, 2013, and she was arrested by the police due to her father’s activities even though she was not a member of Slulim group, and was detained for two months.

In other words, in Islamic areas where the culture of the head of family is strong, the father's participation organizations are considered to have been automatically admitted to their children.

The plaintiff's three villages are also the same.