logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2019.04.03 2018가단62112
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The part of the claim for delivery of a building against Defendant C, which was caused by the termination of a lease agreement, shall be dismissed;

2...

Reasons

1. Where a party who has received a final and conclusive judgment in favor of the part concerning the claim for delivery of a building on the ground of termination of a lease contract among the lawsuit against Defendant C files a lawsuit against the other party to the previous lawsuit identical to that of the judgment in favor of the winning party, the subsequent lawsuit is unlawful as there

On February 12, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Defendant C seeking the delivery of a building listed in the separate sheet (this Court Decision 2016Da26747) on the ground of the termination of the lease agreement, and rendered a favorable judgment, and the said judgment became final and conclusive.

(A4) The above part of the lawsuit against Defendant C is unlawful and thus dismissed.

2. Claim against Defendant C for the delivery of a building on the ground of exclusion of disturbance based on ownership, and claim against the remaining Defendants

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Defendant of applicable provisions of Acts;

2. Confession Judgment (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) 2. 1. 3.

4. Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow