1. The Defendant: (a) on March 16, 2010 to Plaintiff A, KRW 115,916,985, and KRW 3 million to Plaintiff B and C, respectively; and (b) on each of the said money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) E is a Flaren vehicle owned by the husband around 17:00 on March 16, 2010 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

) While driving the Plaintiff and driving the Plaintiff, while driving in the direction of the cluor apartment at the private distance intersection, with influencing the front door of the 1st century, the Plaintiff, who was crossinging the said road, was injured by the Plaintiff A, such as the blood species outside the external brush, the fluor frame, the fluoral frame, the fluor, the fluoral fluor, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”).

(2) Plaintiffs B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the husband of Plaintiff E, who is the owner of the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry in Gap evidence 1 through 6 (including virtual numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition as to the recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs as an operator under Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act.

C. According to the evidence and evidence set forth in the evidence set forth in the evidence set forth in the evidence set forth in the evidence set forth in the evidence set forth in the evidence set forth in the evidence set forth in the above limitation of liability, ① Plaintiff A was involved in the instant accident while crossinging the crosswalks in the vicinity of the crosswalks, and ② Plaintiff A was diagnosed on February 23, 2012 as having been in need of the treatment and psychological treatment for an irregular long period of mental and medical treatment due to symptoms, stress disorder, and stress disorder, but Plaintiff A received a diagnosis on February 23, 2012, but Plaintiff A did not receive any mental treatment other than receiving the treatment at the department of G mental health from June 24, 2011 to November 12, 2011.

The defendant's liability is limited to 70% in calculating the amount of damages that the defendant would compensate for.

2. The scope of liability for damages is the same as each corresponding item of the attached Table of the calculation of damages, except as otherwise stated below.