The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 20 million won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the arguments of this case and the reasons for sentencing indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character, environment, and social relation, etc., the court below's punishment seems to be unreasonable, since it seems that the defendant's punishment is unreasonable, since it is unreasonable that the defendant reflects the defendant's wrong by living in custody for more than four months, that the defendant has no criminal record of being punished in excess of the fine for the same kind of crime, and that the defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime since he was punished for the same crime in 2010, which was around 10 years ago.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is with merit, and the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the following decision is rendered after pleading

【Reasons for the Judgment of the Court which has been written] The summary of facts constituting a crime and evidence recognized by the court is identical to the description of each corresponding column of the judgment of the court below. Thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;