The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of DJP CHERE vehicles.

On September 26, 2016, the Defendant was driving three-lanes in front of the 412-1 red scarlet in the front of the Defendant’s vehicle at the time when other vehicles had stopped on the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle by a stop signal. In such a case, the Defendant was obliged to exercise the duty of care to prevent accidents by putting the front section of the vehicle at the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle and properly operating the steering and operating the steering gear, while neglecting the duty of care, the Defendant neglected to stop and stop on the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle due to negligence while driving the vehicle at the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle. In short, the lower part of the lower part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front section of the 60-1 red scar in the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Defendant 1 caused the injury to the victim E, such as catum catum catum and fatum catum catum, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence, and the injury to the victim I (the fat, 51 years old) of the above rocketing catum catum in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act (a written agreement which contains the victims' intention to be dismissed after the prosecution of this case is instituted);