1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) the buildings listed in paragraph 1 of the attached list;

B. Defendant C shall set out in attached list 2.

Facts of recognition

The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment and consolidation project association established to improve residential environments in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government FF large 89,853 square meters where infrastructure for rearrangement is inferior and the worn-out and inferior buildings are concentrated pursuant to Article 13 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter referred to as the “Urban Improvement Act”). Defendant B is the building and its site listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table in the above zone, Defendant C is the building and its site listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table, Defendant C is the building and its site listed in paragraph (3) of the attached Table, Defendant D is the owner and possessor of each site listed in paragraph (6) of the attached Table and its site, and Defendant E is

(hereinafter referred to as “each building of this case” in the attached list 1, 2, 3, and 6. The Plaintiff obtained authorization from the head of Seongbuk-gu Office for the establishment of each building on April 21, 2009, and obtained authorization for the implementation of the project on April 4, 2013, and obtained authorization for the implementation of the project on December 22, 2014, and publicly notified the management and disposal plan on December 26, 2014.

On June 26, 2015, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Tribunal accepted each of the instant building and its site for the above rearrangement project on June 26, 2015, and rendered a ruling to the effect that KRW 312,015,060 for Defendant B, KRW 177,753,080 for Defendant C, KRW 284,723,960 for Defendant D, and KRW 522,831,810 for Defendant E, respectively.

On August 11, 2015, prior to the date of expropriation prescribed by the above ruling (the date of August 14, 2015), the Plaintiff deposited each of the above compensations with the Defendants as the deposited parties.

【Ground of recognition” without any dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including additional numbers), the purport of the entire pleadings, and the defendants' entire purport of the disposition plan is authorized and publicly notified pursuant to Article 49(6) and (3) of the Urban Improvement Act, the use or profit of the former owner, lessee, etc. for the subject matter shall be suspended, and the project implementer shall take over the subject matter to commence the construction work.