Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant charged with the instant case is a person engaging in driving freight B.
On June 19, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 12:20, and led to the intersection of the E-dong office located in Gwangju Dong-gu C to the school-dong three distance-intersection from the F bank.
At this point, since there is no signal signal, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by thoroughly operating the driver of the vehicle and accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the vehicle.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left on the left without neglecting this, and had the victim G (the age of 60) who was crossing from the right side of the Defendant’s running direction to the left on the left side of the Defendant’s driving direction go beyond the road by taking the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.
Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant suffered serious injury to the victim, such as the injury to brain in the number of days of treatment, the injury of awareness due to the cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral dys, the lower recognition, damage to language functions, etc.
2. The instant case is an offense falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concern
The record reveals that on November 20, 2020, after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the victim expressed his wish not to punish the defendant.
3. According to the conclusion, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.