The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (two years of imprisonment and additional collection) by the lower court is too unreasonable;

2. It is reasonable to take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of all of the instant crimes; (b) the Defendant surrenders himself to himself; and (c) the arrest of the relevant narcotics offender through active investigation cooperation; (d) the Defendant does not want punishment against the Defendant by mutual consent with the victims of traffic accidents; (b) the Defendant does not commit the same crime again; and (c) there is a family member to support the Defendant.

However, each of the crimes of this case is that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case even though the defendant was punished seven times for the same kind of crime (six times of punishment), the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case while the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case while the defendant committed a repeated crime for the same kind of crime, that the amount of the phone handled by the defendant is considerably large enough to be able to administer several white conferences, that the defendant cooperation in the investigation of the crime of this case, that the defendant sold the phone again, and did not take any measures to rescue the victims, etc., and that the defendant sold or received the phiphones. Since the phiphones distributed in our society, there is a need to strictly punish the phiphones, and that there is no special reason to newly consider the sentencing or any special change in the sentencing after the sentence of the court below is sentenced.

The sentencing, which is shown in the record and trial process, such as the above favorable circumstances and unfavorable circumstances, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.