1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions and images of Gap evidence Nos. 3, 10, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and the overall purport of the pleadings, it is recognized that Gap, on March 5, 2015, driven a B vehicle that entered into a car insurance contract with the plaintiff on March 5, 2015, resisted to the right-hand side of the 6th line of the Busan East-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong (hereinafter "the accident in this case"), provided that the plaintiff paid the defendant-owned vehicle damages of KRW 51,40,00 and medical expenses of KRW 485,820 to Gap.

Since the plaintiff extended the damage A due to the negligence of illegal parking of the defendant vehicle, the defendant asserts that as joint tortfeasor, the defendant is liable to pay 40% of the total amount of compensation to the plaintiff. Thus, in the accident of this case where the vehicle driving in the two-lanes deviates from six-lanes, the illegal parking negligence of the defendant vehicle can be considered as negligence on the part of the victim. It is difficult to view the plaintiff's own negligence on the part of the plaintiff as tort. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed.