logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2012.11.01 2012고단870
개발제한구역의지정및관리에관한특별조치법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

If a fine is not paid, 50,000 won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who committed on March 31, 2012 shall change the form and quality of land in a development restriction zone without obtaining permission;

Nevertheless, around March 31, 2012, the Defendant conducted 800 square meters of total forest area in Seongdong-gu, Sungnam-gu, and Dong-gu, which was designated as a development restriction zone, without obtaining permission from the competent administrative agency for changing the form and quality of land.

2. No person shall change the form and quality of land in a development restriction zone without obtaining permission therefor.

Nevertheless, the defendant from March 30, 2012 to the same year.

4.3. Until March, 200, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, which was designated as a development restriction zone, conducted unauthorized banking without obtaining permission from the competent authority for changing the form and quality of land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Each statement of the F;

1. Application of each accusation book and each field photograph Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 32 subparagraph 1 of the Act on Special Measures for Designation and Management of Areas of Restricted Development and Article 12 (1) of the Act on Special Measures for Designation of Areas of Restricted Development; Selection of fines for facts of crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant reflects the crime of this case and completes restoration to the original state, there is no same record, the defendant cannot be seen to have changed the form and quality for private interest, and the defendant's age, attitude after the crime, etc. shall be determined by taking into account the following factors:

arrow