logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.10.15 2015고정96
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

When the insured purchases insurance, he/she shall inform the insured of his/her past history, and the insurance company shall verify the medical records, etc. based on the matters notified by the insured, comprehensively determine whether the victim's medical treatment is completely cured or not, and then refuse the insurance if it conflicts with the insurance policy standards set by the insurance company. In particular, the issue of whether the diagnosis and continuation of medical care, such as hospital treatment, due to the kiddne, is an important duty of disclosure that can be refused to purchase the insurance.

The defendant from January 24, 2003

1. Until April 27, 200, when receiving hospitalized treatment at the Joseon University Hospital as a result of the extension of 4-day period, he did not notify such past disease and purchased an insurance policy without notifying the victim of such past disease, and did not receive insurance proceeds from the victim company.

1. On July 18, 2003 and November 26, 2004, the Defendant subscribed for a contract to subscribe to the “Lifelonging Policy” and “Unsurging and Sticking and Sticking Policy” respectively to C, a designer of the victim life insurance company, respectively, within five years. However, even though the Defendant was hospitalized as a kidging result within five years, the Defendant responded to the obligation to notify the contract prior to the contract as “no question whether the Defendant was hospitalized after undergoing a diagnosis and examination from a doctor during the latest five years, or having received a close inspection (e.g., heart, radiation, health examination, etc.) or was administered for at least seven consecutive days or for at least 30 consecutive days.”

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving a person in charge of the victim company, concluded each of the above insurance contracts with the victim company, and on September 4, 2006, received treatment for kidneculosis from Durology to Durinology due to absence from the Durinology, and filed a claim for insurance proceeds under each of the above insurance contracts with the victim company.

9.18. and

9.26.

arrow