logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.10.18 2016고단3002
상습절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch on July 16, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gansung Vocational Training Prison on November 17, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant opened a locked door at the entrance of the studio at the entrance of the studio in an area where the studio is concentrated for the purpose of preparing living expenses, etc., and opened a locked door to enter the studio in the abandoned house, and brought it

On February 19, 2016, the Defendant discovered that the key installed at the entrance of the building at Silung-si, a studio in front of the studio building located in Silung-si, the Defendant kept the entrance door at 203 mail, the residence of the victim D, and then opened a locked studio using the said key to the victim’s residence and opened a locked 18k gold string in the said 14,000, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 1,030,000, in total, KRW 18k gold 24,000, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 200,000,000, and KRW 18,300,000, total market price of KRW 100,000,000.

In addition, from that time to July 18, 2016, the Defendant habitually stolen property worth KRW 4,530,000,000, in total, on four occasions, including the following methods: (a) from that time, until July 16, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning E and F;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each statement of H, D, and I;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Records of criminal records, copies of written judgment 2015 Godan1451 assistance from the Suwon District Court, and results of confinement of prisoners;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crimes are repeated several times in a planned manner;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 332, 329 and 329 of the Criminal Act for the selection of criminal facts;

arrow