Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Bchip private taxi.

At around 10:30 on September 23, 2014, the Defendant, while driving the above taxi and driving the 55-lane road in the direction of the security investigation zone in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, in the direction of the security investigation zone, entered the green signal to which the non-protective police force is allowed, going into the above intersection and going through the non-protective police force in the direction of the direction of the fences. On September 23, 2014, the Defendant found the victim C (ma, 53 years old) (the south and 53 years old) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the green signal from the right side of the road to the right side of the road, but failed to stop the countermeasures, and caused the victim to go beyond the road with the front-hand part of the above taxi.

As above, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as 10 weeks of medical treatment, e.g., the 10th century, and the 1st century pressure frame, which are necessary for the victim to receive approximately ten weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A supplementary statement stating the occurrence of a traffic accident C;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The reason for sentencing lies in the circumstance that the defendant was negligent in performing his/her duty of care on the front side and the right side by neglecting his/her duty of care from the long distance, and thereby causing the injury to the victim who was a crosswalk pursuant to the new subparagraph. However, since 1985, the defendant has been engaged in taxi driving duties for a long time, there has been no criminal history, and the defendant agreed with the victim, and the victim was the victim's wife.