(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.05.29 2015고정409

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.05.29 2015고정409

절도

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From 00:00 to 03:00 on September 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) concealed the CFS vehicle owned by the victim from the Victim Co., Ltd., 00:0 to 03:00 on the same day; and (b) returned the damaged vehicle within the LG CD parking lot located in the PG CD parking lot located in the PPS on the same day at the PPS 04:10 on the same day, the Defendant was willing to steal the damaged vehicle by using the fact that the vehicle’s door may still go on the vehicle without leaving the vehicle in a remote manner, when the vehicle’s door is moved to the victim company while being sitting or opening the door.

Accordingly, the defendant called the victim company with the inside of the damaged vehicle to lock the door of the vehicle, and the defendant, in inside, removed the GaPS tracking device installed inside the vehicle damaged by the start, and operated it on his own.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the vehicle owned by the victim under the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the accused prepared by the police;

1. Statement of D;

1. A report on occurrence (thief) and a request for cooperation in investigation (the defendant and his defense counsel sought that there was no intention of theft because they were used and returned the instant vehicle. A person who has the intent of unlawful acquisition necessary for the establishment of larceny refers to the intent to exclude the right holder and use and dispose of another person's goods as his/her own property. According to the evidence above, around September 5, 2014, the defendant called to the customer center at around 03:59, and taken measures to lock the door of the instant vehicle from the customer center (the defendant attempted to lock the door of the instant vehicle from the police, but did not go to the customer center, and did not go to the customer center, and made an objective statement different from the facts.

. The defendant.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2020.06.18 2019고단4661

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.08.11 2016고단1266

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.02.21 2013고단107

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.09.06 2016고단508

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.10.01 2019고단1508