The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation) is too unreasonable.

2. On the other hand, the Defendant is against the principle of good faith when recognizing the facts charged, and upon agreement with the victims, they do not want the punishment of the Defendant, and when the Defendant is subject to suspended execution, there are circumstances that the Defendant should retire from the workplace.

In addition, vehicles operated by the defendant are covered by comprehensive insurance, and the defendant's wife wants to take the defendant's wife.

However, the blood alcohol content of this case is not lower than 0.083%, and the accident of this case occurred due to the Defendant’s center bed, and the distance driven by the Defendant is about 20km.

In addition, among four victims of the accident in this case, the denied victim of the defendant was significantly different, and the defendant was punished once due to drunk driving.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, character and conduct, and circumstances after committing the crime, the lower court’s sentence is not deemed unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[As it is obvious that the "Attorney B (Korean National Assembly)" in Part 8 of the original decision is a clerical error of "Attorney M", it shall be corrected ex officio."