logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2007.10.18 2007재나115
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the defendant;

purport, purport, ..

Reasons

1. The following facts are apparent in records:

On January 16, 2001, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking implementation of the procedure for ownership transfer registration, which was based on trade reservation, on January 15, 2001, with respect to real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2004Gada152894, Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2004GaGa152894), and on January 16, 2001, the Seoul Central District Court rendered a judgment accepting the claim by the above court on February 16, 2005. Although the Defendant appealed against this, the Plaintiff appealed on September 8, 2005 on January 15, 2005, the date of the purchase and sale reservation changed from January 15, 2001 to June 10, 2004, and the first instance judgment became final and conclusive by the Supreme Court Decision 2005Da136136, Jun. 13, 2005.

B. The judgment subject to review of the contents of the judgment subject to review cited the contents of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. "The plaintiff is the mother of the defendant, taking full account of no dispute between the parties, or the whole purport of the entries and arguments in the evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the plaintiff is the defendant's mother. On October 15, 1981, the defendant entered into a contract with the non-party Korea Housing Corporation for sale in lots with 9,561,000 won on October 26, 1981, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on August 27, 1985 with respect to the apartment of this case on October 26, 1981, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale on January 16, 2001, under the name of the plaintiff, the Seoul Central District Court of Justice No. 2819, Jun. 16, 2001.

arrow