logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.11.07 2013노1350
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant was sentenced to a fine due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury on Risk), and Defendant’s driver’s car is admitted only to liability insurance and there is no agreement with the victims in light of the following: (a) the Defendant, while driving a car without obtaining a driver’s license, caused injury to the victim C and E by shocking the damaged car by failing to properly examine the right and the right and the right and the right of the car; and (b) the Defendant immediately stops the damaged car while leaving the site without taking necessary measures such as aiding the victims; and (c) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc.

2. Even when considering the above circumstances alleged by the public prosecutor in light of the fact that the defendant's mistake and reflects the defendant's mistake, the defendant does not scrap and repeat the vehicle driven by the defendant, the defendant does not have any other criminal records other than a fine once, the victim's injury is not excessive, the defendant is at the location to support his parent and female, the victim's damage can be recovered through liability insurance, and other circumstances, such as the defendant's character, conduct and environment, the background and result of the crime in this case, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered to be unfair. Thus, the prosecutor's allegation above is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow