Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 4,00,000 won, by a fine of 7,00,000 won, and by a fine of 7,00,000 won, and Defendant C, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. by Defendants A and C (joint assault) heard at around 03:30 on November 21, 2015, the 6th room below H 1st floor of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (H 3:3:30 on November 21, 2015) that the Defendant’s speech that the Defendant shall order both sides at the latest from the JJ of the UAW unmanneds, and Defendant C violated the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. by facing the wall facing the victim’s hand, etc., and Defendant A assaulted the victim’s face by drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

2. The Defendants jointly committed the crime of the Defendants at the aftermath of the sixth following the day specified in the preceding paragraph, and for the said reason, Defendant A was sprinked with an employee K’s spather and pushed ahead with the victim J, sponsed the female employee’s name in a knickter, sponsed the female employee’s name in a knicker, and spated with the voice “on the face of a spating in a singing room,” and Defendant C and Defendant B, at the same time, fightd with the body of his employee K, etc., and spatd with a large voice, spatd with the 20 minutes, such as spathering the disturbance, and spating the entire customers with other spats.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the victim's singing-making operation by force.

3. Defendant B, on November 21, 2015, as indicated in paragraph (2) around 04:20 on November 21, 2015, committed a bucker’s bucks to the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station Mon located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, that caused the Defendant to resist the fact of arresting himself, and assault the Nbuck’s bucks located in the said earth

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

4. The Defendant C, at the time and place set forth in paragraph 3, took photographs of the police officers belonging to the said district unit and the police officers subject to the investigation by the said J in the protocol.