Defendants are not guilty.

1. Defendants are the legal couple of the facts charged, and Defendant A and the victim C were the legal couple from February 200 to January 2008, and they were divorced.

피고인들은 함께 2016. 8. 8. 대구 수성구 D에 있는 E에서 F이 피고인 A과 피해자 사이의 양육비 인상소송에서 피고인 A에게 불리한 사실확인서를 써 주었다는 이유로 이를 따지던 중 F에게 "피해자는 아이들에게 상할 것 같은 음식을 주고, 재활용 옷을 입혔다. 피해자는 또 돈 밖에 모른다. 아이들을 학대하는 팥쥐 엄마다.“라고 말을 하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to insult the victim publicly.

2. Determination

A. In addition, the Defendants and the defense counsel did not make a statement to F as to the victim as stated in the facts charged, and the Defendants mentioned the victim at the only place F at the time of the instant case, so there is no performance.

B. The public performance, which is the constituent element of the crime of insulting and determining performance, refers to a state in which many, unspecified persons can be recognized. Although the fact is publicly known to one person, if it is possible to spread it to an unspecified or unspecified person, it satisfies the requirements of performance, but if there is no possibility to spread it differently, the crime of insult is not established.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the court’s duly adopted and investigated evidence, namely, ① the Defendants and one person working at the instant site and one person working at the instant site, and ② the fact in relation to the child support increase lawsuit between the Defendant A and the victim upon the request of G and the victim, was prepared by the victim a confirmation statement of facts that the Defendants seem to know well the economic situation or living habits of the Defendants despite the absence of direct knowledge of the Defendants. However, the Defendants were to F.