1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is that of the court of first instance except for the following cases, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Parts to be dried;

A. The 6th day of the first instance judgment “interest first” in the 11st day of the first instance judgment shall be “interest first” and “interest first.”

(b) 105,278,452 won “15,87,452 won” of the 6th 13 parallels and 16 parallels “15,879,452 won” of the 6th 105,279,452 “103,278,452 won” of the 6th 21 parallels “103,279,452 won” of “103,279,453,794 of the 7th 3th 30,85,79 of the 7th 16 parallels “30,79,479,794 of the 7th 19,79,794” of “30,79,749,79,794 of the 7th 19,73rd parallels” of “30,79,794,794,794 of the 7th jud 79,7949,75” of the “

3. Determination as to the defendant's application for resumption of pleading

A. In principle, the court’s discretion to accept an application for resumption of oral argument when the parties filed an application for resumption of oral argument to submit arguments and evidence after the closing of oral argument.

However, the party who filed an application for resumption of pleadings was not given the opportunity to submit arguments and certifications due to the circumstances for which it is difficult for him/her to be responsible prior to the closing of pleadings, and where the subject matter of argument and certification falls under facts requiring proof that may depend on the outcome of the judgment, etc., in cases where rendering a judgment against the party without the opportunity to submit arguments and certification violates the procedural justice pursued by the Civil Procedure Act, the court is obliged to resume the pleadings

(Supreme Court Decision 2013Da27343 Decided October 27, 2014). B.