The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (three years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. There are circumstances that can be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the following: (a) the Defendant’s mistake was divided; (b) the Defendant’s release after having completed the execution of the previous crime; and (c) it appears that the Defendant was unable to resolve the problem of food, such as a soup or soup, making soup, etc. after being released from the previous crime; and (d) the Defendant was unable to read and use properly with the academic background of early retirement in the third grade of the elementary school; and (b) it was difficult for the Defendant to find a changing job due to his or her ignorance

However, the Defendant committed the thief crime of this case, which had a ten-time thief history on the part of the Defendant, and committed the thief crime of this case, starting 4 days after the Defendant completed the punishment by committing the thief, and beginning 4 days again, and starting thief for about 1 month, and committing the thief crime of this case. The thief crime of this case was committed by mainly destroying and intrusioning the entrance and exit of the place of business. In full view of the following: the Defendant’s age, family relation, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed to be excessively heavy, and thus

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.