A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA strawing car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (Egress after accidents).

On March 29, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 01:10, and led to the left turn to the left at the four-lanes of the five-lanes between the two-lanes of the government office building in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul and the two-lanes of the luminous intersection in front of the government office building in Sejong-ro 1-68.

At this point, there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reducing speed and driving the signal well by driving the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the F-business taxi operated by the Defendant, who was in the direct position under the new code, from the inner intersection to the inner intersection by the negligence of the left-hand turn, even though the signal was suspended, the Defendant received the front part of the F-business taxi operated by the Defendant, with the front part of the F-business taxi operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim G (28 taxes) who was on the top of the above taxi due to the 3 weeks of light base care, such as salt and tension, etc., and at the same time, did not immediately stop the above taxi owned by the victim with the victim’s moving-in video company to the extent of KRW 1,448,438, such as the exchange of even the head of the above taxi, and did not take necessary measures, such as saving the victim, even though the Defendant destroyed the above taxi owned by the victim’s moving-in video company.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driven the said rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.161% at a section of approximately 1km from around the 1km to the front of the national ancient city museum located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul at the time of the day set forth in paragraph 1 to the 57-ro of Jongno-gu Seoul.