Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Criminal facts

From October 6, 2016, at around 12:50 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) managed the Defendant’s apartment house B in Busan Eastdong-gu, and the Defendant’s house located in 117 dong 2602 on the same day; and (b) disputed the issue of using living expenses without being entered into the Defendant and using the Defendant’s living expenses at the home of the Defendant’s wife, and assaulted the Defendant, as his hand, by gathering plastic cups and booms in a bit of bit of bitch bit of bit of bit of bitch,” and threateninging the victim’s face with drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of a protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for each victim;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the handling of reports on investigation, photographs, and reports 112, respectively;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the Defendant did not assault the victim. However, considering the fact that the Defendant was wraped by the World Cup and wallets as stated in the police’s reasoning, considering the fact that the Defendant was in the possession of the World Cup as well as the window of the ward at the time of committing the instant crime, the victim’s police statement that the Defendant used to assault the victim as stated in its reasoning is credibility.

Therefore, the facts charged in the instant case are sufficient to be found guilty.

The punishment shall be determined in light of the overall circumstances, such as the developments and degree of the assault of this case, the relationship with the victim, and the fact that there is no criminal history against the defendant, the defendant was subject to a measure such as the emergency ad hoc measure prohibiting access on the day of the crime, and the decision to take ad hoc measures, and the fact that the defendant seems to comply with the above prohibition order until now.