The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the lower court is too unreasonable as the penalty (2 million won) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment is recognized and reflected in the crime, and there are no criminal records for the same kind of crime, etc. are favorable circumstances.

However, the lower court appears to have determined the punishment in consideration of the favorable circumstances, and there is no change of circumstances that may be considered in the sentencing newly after the pronouncement of the lower judgment, and the commission of stolen goods brokerage is promoting or supporting the thief crime, and the liability for the crime is not less severe, and other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, are considered as having been committed, and it is difficult to view that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, we do not accept the above argument of the defendant's above sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.