A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On March 31, 2015, at around 21:08, the Defendant sent one lane in front of Changsung, Co., Ltd., Ltd., which is located in the 73-ro of the Yellowdong Corporation, Seosung-dong Corporation, Chungcheongnam-dong, Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, from the Home Pluter to the riverside from the Home Pluter to the riverside.

At the time, since it is at night, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty to keep the front door well.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeded as it is, and it did not look at the victim D (59 years old) who is a pedestrian who is walking on the right side, and did not have the victim D (59 years old), which is a pedestrian who is walking on the right side of the above vehicle, and shocked the victim's hurri and bridge with the front side and rear side of the above vehicle.

The Defendant, due to such occupational negligence, suffered from the right-hand room for about two weeks of treatment to the victim, but failed to immediately stop and take measures such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of witness D and E;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel on the traffic accident report report, black booms and CCTV-cap photographs, each investigation report (video analysis and CD copy attachment), Corhon CD, F2 factory CCTV, diagnostic records, field photographs, field photographs, field photographs, field additional photographs, G hospital medical records, H hospital medical expenses, and H hospital medical expenses, and his/her defense counsel

1. The summary of the argument was that the Defendant driven a rocketing car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) and did not shock the victim at the time and place of the instant accident.

Even if the defendant shocked the victim, it cannot be said that the injury suffered by the victim was caused by the shock in light of the part of the injury, and the defendant's vehicle in this case is the victim.